NEUROLAW • Litigation Mind Game

LITIGATION MIND GAME

SESSION: IN PROGRESS
State v. Anderson (2024)
Case #NEURO-7B2-4F9

Defendant is charged with breach of contract for failing to deliver 500 units of neuro-enhancement chips by the agreed date. Plaintiff claims $2.4M in damages. Defendant counters that the delay was caused by FDA regulatory hurdles constituting force majeure under Section 12.3 of the contract.

The court should grant summary judgment for the defendant if:
A) The plaintiff fails to appear at the hearing
B) The defendant's CEO provides an affidavit
C) No genuine dispute exists about the FDA's regulatory action
D) The contract specifies California law applies
ATTORNEY METRICS
87%
Legal Accuracy
24
Cases Completed
9.2s
Avg Response Time
92%
Focus
78%
Recall
64%
Logic
85%
Composure
-